Study of Thoracic CT in COVID-19: The STOIC Project.

Background There are conflicting data regarding the diagnostic performance of chest CT for COVID-19 pneumonia. Disease extent at CT has been reported to influence prognosis. Purpose To create a large publicly available data set and assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of CT in COVID-19 pneumonia. Materials and Methods This multicenter, observational, retrospective cohort study involved 20 French university hospitals. Eligible patients presented at the emergency departments of the hospitals involved between March 1 and April 30th, 2020, and underwent both thoracic CT and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing for suspected COVID-19 pneumonia. CT images were read blinded to initial reports, RT-PCR, demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and outcome. Readers classified CT scans as either positive or negative for COVID-19 based on criteria published by the French Society of Radiology. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop a model predicting severe outcome (intubation or death) at 1-month follow-up in patients positive for both RT-PCR and CT, using clinical and radiologic features. Results Among 10 930 patients screened for eligibility, 10 735 (median age, 65 years; interquartile range, 51-77 years; 6147 men) were included and 6448 (60%) had a positive RT-PCR result. With RT-PCR as reference, the sensitivity and specificity of CT were 80.2% (95% CI: 79.3, 81.2) and 79.7% (95% CI: 78.5, 80.9), respectively, with strong agreement between junior and senior radiologists (Gwet AC1 coefficient, 0.79). Of all the variables analyzed, the extent of pneumonia at CT (odds ratio, 3.25; 95% CI: 2.71, 3.89) was the best predictor of severe outcome at 1 month. A score based solely on clinical variables predicted a severe outcome with an area under the curve of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.66), improving to 0.69 (95% CI: 0.6, 0.71) when it also included the extent of pneumonia and coronary calcium score at CT. Conclusion Using predefined criteria, CT reading is not influenced by reader's experience and helps predict the outcome at 1 month. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04355507 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Rubin in this issue.

AI-driven quantification, staging and outcome prediction of COVID-19 pneumonia.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in 2019 and disseminated around the world rapidly. Computed tomography (CT) imaging has been proven to be an important tool for screening, disease quantification and staging. The latter is of extreme importance for organizational anticipation (availability of intensive care unit beds, patient management planning) as well as to accelerate drug development through rapid, reproducible and quantified assessment of treatment response. Even if currently there are no specific guidelines for the staging of the patients, CT together with some clinical and biological biomarkers are used. In this study, we collected a multi-center cohort and we investigated the use of medical imaging and artificial intelligence for disease quantification, staging and outcome prediction. Our approach relies on automatic deep learning-based disease quantification using an ensemble of architectures, and a data-driven consensus for the staging and outcome prediction of the patients fusing imaging biomarkers with clinical and biological attributes. Highly promising results on multiple external/independent evaluation cohorts as well as comparisons with expert human readers demonstrate the potentials of our approach.

COVID-19 pneumonia: Diagnostic and prognostic role of CT based on a retrospective analysis of 214 consecutive patients from Paris, France.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of CT in patients referred for COVID19 suspicion to a French university hospital, depending on symptoms and date of onset. METHODS: From March 1st to March 28th, 214 patients having both chest CT scan and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT- PCT) within 24 h were retrospectively evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of first and expert readings were calculated together with inter reader agreement, with results of RT-PCR as standard of reference and according to symptoms and onset date. Patient characteristics and disease extent on CT were correlated to short-term outcome (death or intubation at 3 weeks follow-up). RESULTS: Of the 214 patients (119 men, mean age 59 ±â€¯19 years), 129 had at least one positive RT-PCR result. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were 79 % (95 % CI: 71-86 %), 84 %(74-91 %), 72 %(63-81 %) and 88 % (81-93 %) for initial CT reading and 81 %(74-88 %), 91 % (82-96 %), 76 % (67-84 %) and 93 % (87-97 %), for expert reading, with strong inter-reader agreement (kappa index: 0.89). Considering the 123 patients with symptoms for more than 5 days, the corresponding figures were 90 %, 78 %, 80 % and 89 % for initial reading and 93 %, 88 %, 86 % and 94 % for the expert. Disease extent exceeded 25 % for 68 % and 26 % of severe and non-severe patients, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CT sensitivity increased after 5 days of symptoms. A disease extent > 25 % was associated with poorer outcome.

Quantification of Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease with Radiomics-based CT Scores.

PURPOSE: To develop radiomics-based CT scores for assessing lung disease severity and exacerbation risk in adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This two-center retrospective observational study was approved by an institutional ethics committee, and the need for patient consent was waived. A total of 215 outpatients with CF referred for unenhanced follow-up chest CT were evaluated in two different centers between January 2013 and December 2016. After lung segmentation, chest CT scans from center 1 (training cohort, 162 patients [median age, 29 years; interquartile range {IQR}, 24-36 years; 84 men]) were used to build CT scores from 38 extracted CT features, using five different machine learning techniques trained to predict a clinical prognostic score, the Nkam score. The correlations between the developed CT scores, two different clinical prognostic scores (Liou and CF-ABLE), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and risk of respiratory exacerbations were evaluated in the test cohort (center 2, 53 patients [median age, 27 years; IQR, 22-35 years; 34 men]) using the Spearman rank coefficient. RESULTS: In the test cohort, all radiomics-based CT scores showed moderate to strong correlation with the Nkam score (R = 0.57 to 0.63, P < .001) and Liou scores (R = -0.55 to -0.65, P < .001), whereas the correlation with CF-ABLE score was weaker (R = 0.28 to 0.38, P = .005 to .048). The developed CT scores showed strong correlation with predicted FEV1 (R = -0.62 to -0.66, P < .001) and weak to moderate correlation with the number of pulmonary exacerbations to occur in the 12 months after the CT examination (R = 0.38 to 0.55, P < .001 to P = .006). CONCLUSION: Radiomics can be used to build automated CT scores that correlate to clinical severity and exacerbation risk in adult patients with CF.Supplemental material is available for this article.See also the commentary by Elicker and Sohn in this issue.© RSNA, 2020.